Results by reading level for Tales from the Flaming Faggot:
Basic | 55% | |
Intermediate | 35% | |
Advanced | 8% |
By comparison, here are the results for Canada's national newspaper, the Globe and Mail, which is also of intermediate reading level, though with a larger overall proportion of intermediate level articles:
Results by reading level for Toronto Globe and Mail:
Basic | 21% | |
Intermediate | 71% | |
Advanced | 7% |
And it's American equivalent, the New York Times, which has an even spread of Basic, Intermediate, and Advanced level articles:
Results by reading level for New York Times:
Basic | 31% | |
Intermediate | 38% | |
Advanced | 30% |
And, just for fun, the World Weekly News, which is rated as Basic reading level although, apparently, they have a larger percentage of Intermediate articles and a smaller percentage of Basic articles than my own blog:
Results by reading level for World Weekly News:
Basic | 41% | |
Intermediate | 56% | |
Advanced | 1% |
This filter is kind of neat, although I'm skeptical about it's accuracy. I've noticed that the overall reading level doesn't always jive with the breakdown of articles by reading level. I'm also not sure that the filter is of any practical value, but it is kind of fun to play with.
If you'd like to check out how your own blog is rated click the 'Advanced Search' function below the Google Search bar and select 'annotated reading level' from the drop down list.
2 comments:
Here are my results:
http://swordandsanity.blogspot.com/2010/12/fun-with-google-reading-level-filter.html
Nothing advanced... but then again I do not have a Ph.D. like someone I know! ;-)
This is why I'm skeptical about the results. Your blog is rated as Basic reading level overall, despite the fact that you have a higher percentage of both intermediate and advanced level posts than I do.
I guess I'd have to read more to find out how they are conducting their assessments, but I guess I'm not that curious :)
Post a Comment